Kugelspot
Posts : 649
Join date : 2009-03-28
Age : 33
 |  Subject: Headless bass with trem Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:06 pm | |
| Would it work to install a Kahler on a Kramer Duke?  It might because it uses normal tuners and everything, but I'm afraid it won't because they are backwards. | |
|
madmike
Posts : 1756
Join date : 2009-03-23
Age : 54
Location : phoenixville, pa. u.s. of a
| | Subject: Re: Headless bass with trem Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:39 pm | |
| i dont see how i could make it work with a kahler.  but i am thinking about how to put a whamola arm on the top of the neck!  this bass is just a pretty bad moe foe the way it is! | |
|
EricHaven
Admin
Posts : 2974
Join date : 2009-03-20
Age : 58
Location : Birch Bay, WA
| | Subject: Re: Headless bass with trem Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:12 pm | |
| Sorry, Kugelspot. I don't think this can be done. The most obvious reason is that since the tuners are on the bottom where the Kahler would go, you would have no way of tuning the strings. The Bach Musik bass trem has fine tuners, but I don't think they travel far enough to be able to bring completely slackened strings all the way to pitch. And there's always our dear friends at Steinberger who are willing to take thousands of dollars for one of their TransTrems!  | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Headless bass with trem | |
| |
|
